Proposed ADHO Foundation Recommendation
ADHO Foundation Recommendation Version 1.1 This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how the ADHO Executive should be structured and the ADHO Foundation document changed. This document is a step towards […]
Proposed ADHO SIGs, Associate, and Affiliate Organization Recommendations
This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how ADHO Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and Associate (AO) and Affiliate (AfO) Organizations be structured, recognized, and supported. This document is a step towards […]
Proposed Committee Recommendations
ADHO Committees v.2 This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how the ADHO Executive should be structured and the ADHO Foundation document changed. This document is a step towards replacing parts […]
Proposed Executive Board Scenarios
ADHO Executive Board Scenarios Version 2.3 This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how the ADHO Executive should be structured and the ADHO Foundation document changed. This document is a step […]
Proposed Governance Scenarios
This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how ADHO should be governed through the Constituent Organization Board (COB). This document is a step towards replacing parts of the Governance Protocol with […]
Proposed Financial Scenarios
ADHO Implementation Committee Financial Model Recommendations Version 2.2 This document was prepared by the ADHO Implementation Committee (IC) for the ADHO Steering Committee following the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents. It is a recommendation for how ADHO finances could be governed. It is shared with all so that we can get […]
Implementation Committee Roadmap
What questions is the Implementation Committee addressing? We have spent the first months reviewing documents and developing a roadmap for our deliberations. This follows the guidance of the ADHO Governance Proposals and other documents shared with us.
Introducing the ADHO Implementation Committee
Welcome to the blog of the ADHO Implementation Committee. We are a committee made up of: Geoffrey Rockwell, Chair <geoffrey dot rockwell at ualberta dot ca> Melissa Terras<mterras at ed dot ac dot uk> Christian-Emil Smith Ore<c dot e dot s dot ore at iln dot uio dot no> Jennifer Juiliano <jenguiliano at gmail.com> We have […]
Recent Comments in this Document
June 23, 2018 at 6:02 pm
I’m in agreement with Elisabeth on the question of SIG representation, in that I think that COs (as currently constituted, largely by region) offer the primary point of membership for DH matters. I think SIGs are important, but I see a difference between interest groups and membership organizations
See in context
June 23, 2018 at 5:59 pm
I support scenario 1, as it seems to strike the best balance between ensuring the continuing health of ADHO, moving ADHO towards a leaner organizational structure, and distributing decision-making power more equitably among the community of COs. At a moment when DH is proliferating across the globe, scenario 1 offers us the best chance to hear the voices of new organizations and new members while retaining the overall strength of the organization as a whole.
See in context
June 21, 2018 at 7:48 pm
correction: my good example was to be DHN not a non existant DHD. The German speaking is called DHd.
See in context
May 24, 2018 at 7:47 pm
Thanks
See in context
May 24, 2018 at 7:43 pm
Thanks
See in context
May 20, 2018 at 4:22 pm
[it currently has three Partner Organization: DH Benelux, Russian DH Network, Czech DH Initiative.]
This needs to be corrected, because EADH has only one Partner Organisation DH Benelux
See in context
May 20, 2018 at 4:20 pm
[SIGs may be proposed by any group of ADHO members]
Members of ADHO are COs. Thus what is meant by members needs to be specified, for example “by any group of members of COs of ADHO”
See in context
May 20, 2018 at 4:18 pm
[Note. There are currently 3 AOs: AIUCD (Italy); DHd (German-speaking); DHN (Nordic countries). All have a relationship with EADH as their partner CO.]
This needs to be corrected, because EADH has 5 AOs: AIUCD (Italy); DHd (German-speaking); DHN (Nordic countries), CZDHI (Czech), DH Russia (Russia)
See in context
May 20, 2018 at 4:15 pm
[chapter]
this term should not be used. It is not clear what it means. There is no definition of it anywhere
According to me B.1 Associate Organisations (AO) contains contradictions (see “allied to ADHO”).
I am also unsure whether ADHO should be responsible for determining the size of membership of an AO of a CO, for assigning it to a CO (there might be special cases which require such an assignement, but we should not make this the rule). I am against that ADHO establishes that an AO can be associated with more than one CO because this would make the handling of structural terms and finance unviable.
The whole matter of AOs should be discussed with EADH because it is up to now the only CO which has AOs. It has a lot of experience and can serve as a model for other COs which are thinking on having AOs.
See in context
May 20, 2018 at 4:02 pm
My comment refers to AOs alone. If the members of ADHO are COs and if AOs are AOs of COs then the responsibility with respect to disbursements (the only exception might be Scenario 3) is the responsibility of the COs, i.e. ADHO has no influence / nothing to say on this.
See in context